| Peer-Reviewed

Manufacturing, Physical and Chemical Characterization of Fire Clay Brick Value Added with Cow Dung Ash

Received: 25 May 2019     Accepted: 24 June 2019     Published: 12 July 2019
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Aim of this study was to introduce an eco-friendly, low cost and durable clay bricks with partial substitution of Cow Dung Ash (CDA). Five types of clay brick, consist CDA percentages 0, 5 10, 15 and 20% to the total weight of mixture, were manufactured by employing traditional method of dimension (18.5×8.5×6.5) cm3. The clay and CDA were well mixed with the addition of sufficient amount of water to form a good workability. Green molded bricks were allowed to dry under sunlight for two days and then fired in the traditional brick kiln. Physical properties of the burned red bricks were then tested and analyzed with Sri Lankan and British Standard Specifications. The average density, water absorption, compressive strength and flexural strength for 10% Cow Dung Ash (CDA) are 1447 kg.m-3, 17%, 150 kg.cm-2 and 0.82 kg.cm-2 respectively. These physical properties were compared with the standard brick purely manufactured from clay. From the results, clay-CDA bricks are obviously superior to the control brick; those are available in the Eastern region markets.

Published in American Journal of Materials Synthesis and Processing (Volume 4, Issue 1)
DOI 10.11648/j.ajmsp.20190401.14
Page(s) 32-36
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2019. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

"Cow Dung, Cow Dung Ash, Fired Clay Bricks, Compressive Strength, Flexural Strength, Value Addition, Water Absorption, Eco-friendly "

References
[1] Kute S, Deodhar S. “Effect of fly ash and temperature on properties of burnt clay bricks”, Journal of Institute of Engineers, Vol. 84. Pp. 82–85, 2003.
[2] Ducman V and Kopar T. “The influence of different waste additions to clay-product mixtures”, Material Technology, Vol. 416. Pp. 289–293, 2007.
[3] Hauck D, Ruppik M and Hornschemeyer S. “Influence of the raw material composition on the strength and thermal conductivity of vertically perforated clay bricks and blocks”, Zi-Annual, annual for the brick and tile, structural ceramics and clay pipe industries, Vol. 4. Pp. 54–80, 1998.
[4] Valenti G. L., Cioffi R., Santoro L and Ranchetti S. “Influence of chemical and physical properties of Italian fly ash on reactivity towards lime, phosphogypsum and water”, Cement and Concrete Resources, Vol. 18. Pp. 91–102, 1988.
[5] Bhanumathidas N and Kalidas N. “New trends in bricks and blocks – the role of FaL–G”, Indian Concrete Journal, Vol. 66. Pp. 389–392, 1992.
[6] Singh L. P. “Investigation of physical properties of bricks utilizing fly ash, lime and gypsum”, Master thesis, Kanpur University, Kanpur, India, 1994.
[7] Kumar S. “Fly ash–lime–phosphogypsum cementitious binder— a new trend in bricks”, Material and Structure, Vol. 33. Pp. 59–64, 2000.
[8] Kidsarin pimraksa, Mathias welhlem, Michael Kochberger and Werner Wruss.” A new approach to the production of bricks made with 100% Fly ash”, 2001 International Ash Utilization Symposium. Center of Applied energy Research, University of Kentucky, Lexington, United Kingdom, 2001.
[9] De Silva P. and Crenstil K. S. 'The Effect of Al2O3 and SiO2 On Setting and Hardening of Na2O-Al2O3-SiO2- H2O Geopolymer Systems', J. Aust. Ceram. Soc. Vol. 44. No. 1. Pp. 39-46, 2008.
[10] Fernando P. R. “Experimental Investigation of the Effect of Fired Clay Brick on Partial Replacement of Rice Husk Ash (RHA) with Brick Clay”, Advances in Recycling & Waste Management, USA, Vol. 2 (1). Pp. 120, 2017.
[11] Fernando P. R. “Mechanical and Physical Properties of Fired Clay Brick Partial Doped with Coconut Shell Ash”, American Journal of Energy and Natural Resources, Vol. 6 (5). Pp. 58-63, 2017.
[12] Badr El-Din Ezzat Hegazy, Hanan Ahmed Fouad and Ahmed Mohammed Hassanain. “Incorporation of water sludge, silica fume, and rice husk ash in brick making”, Advances in Environmental Research, Vol. 1. Pp. 83-96, 2012.
[13] Michele Dondi, Guia Guarini, Mariarosa Raimondo, Chiara Zanelli, Daniele Dalle Fabbriche and Antonio Agostini. “Recycling the insoluble residue from titania slag dissolution (tionite) in clay bricks”, Ceramic International, Vol. 36. Pp. 2461-2467, 2010.
[14] Ismail Demir. “Effect of organic residues addition on the technological properties of clay bricks”, Waste Management Research, Vol. 28. Pp. 622–627, 2008.
[15] Dondi M., Guarini G., Raimondo M. and Zanelli C. “Recycling PC and TV waste glass in clay bricks and roof tiles”, Waste Management, Vol. 29. Pp. 1945–1951, 2009.
[16] Kae Long Lin. “Feasibility study of using brick made from municipal solid waste incinerator fly ash slag”, Journal of Hazardous Materials, Vol. 137. Pp. 1810–1816, 2006.
[17] Omoniyi, T., Duna, S. and Mohammed, A. “Compressive strength Characteristic of Cowdung ash blended cement Concrete”, International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Vol. 5 (7). Pp. 770-778, 2014.
[18] Quintilio Piattoni, Enrico Quagliarini, Stefano Lenci. “Experimental analysis and modeling of the mechanical behavior of earthen bricks", Construction Building Material, Vol. 25. Pp. 2067-2075, 2011.
[19] BS 5628: PART 1: Code Of Practice For Use Of Masonry, British Standards Institute, United Kingdom, 2005.
[20] Kiyohiko I., Hyung-Sun K., Koichi K and Atsuchi, H. Influence of firing temperature on frost resistance of roofing tiles. Journal of the European ceramic Society, Vol. 24 (14), Pp. 3671-3677, 2004.
[21] Fernando P. R., Kannangara G. K., Buddhika G. P., Urushiya A. “Synthesis and Characterization of Sustainable Man-Made Low Cost Clay Bricks with Bamboo Leaf Ash”. Engineering Physics, Vol. 2 (1), Pp. 15-22, 2018.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Pius Rodney Fernando, Somasundaram Krishanth, Nilantha Bandara Rathnayake, Shanilka Aruni Welarahne. (2019). Manufacturing, Physical and Chemical Characterization of Fire Clay Brick Value Added with Cow Dung Ash. American Journal of Materials Synthesis and Processing, 4(1), 32-36. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajmsp.20190401.14

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Pius Rodney Fernando; Somasundaram Krishanth; Nilantha Bandara Rathnayake; Shanilka Aruni Welarahne. Manufacturing, Physical and Chemical Characterization of Fire Clay Brick Value Added with Cow Dung Ash. Am. J. Mater. Synth. Process. 2019, 4(1), 32-36. doi: 10.11648/j.ajmsp.20190401.14

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Pius Rodney Fernando, Somasundaram Krishanth, Nilantha Bandara Rathnayake, Shanilka Aruni Welarahne. Manufacturing, Physical and Chemical Characterization of Fire Clay Brick Value Added with Cow Dung Ash. Am J Mater Synth Process. 2019;4(1):32-36. doi: 10.11648/j.ajmsp.20190401.14

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ajmsp.20190401.14,
      author = {Pius Rodney Fernando and Somasundaram Krishanth and Nilantha Bandara Rathnayake and Shanilka Aruni Welarahne},
      title = {Manufacturing, Physical and Chemical Characterization of Fire Clay Brick Value Added with Cow Dung Ash},
      journal = {American Journal of Materials Synthesis and Processing},
      volume = {4},
      number = {1},
      pages = {32-36},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ajmsp.20190401.14},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajmsp.20190401.14},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajmsp.20190401.14},
      abstract = {Aim of this study was to introduce an eco-friendly, low cost and durable clay bricks with partial substitution of Cow Dung Ash (CDA). Five types of clay brick, consist CDA percentages 0, 5 10, 15 and 20% to the total weight of mixture, were manufactured by employing traditional method of dimension (18.5×8.5×6.5) cm3. The clay and CDA were well mixed with the addition of sufficient amount of water to form a good workability. Green molded bricks were allowed to dry under sunlight for two days and then fired in the traditional brick kiln. Physical properties of the burned red bricks were then tested and analyzed with Sri Lankan and British Standard Specifications. The average density, water absorption, compressive strength and flexural strength for 10% Cow Dung Ash (CDA) are 1447 kg.m-3, 17%, 150 kg.cm-2 and 0.82 kg.cm-2 respectively. These physical properties were compared with the standard brick purely manufactured from clay. From the results, clay-CDA bricks are obviously superior to the control brick; those are available in the Eastern region markets.},
     year = {2019}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Manufacturing, Physical and Chemical Characterization of Fire Clay Brick Value Added with Cow Dung Ash
    AU  - Pius Rodney Fernando
    AU  - Somasundaram Krishanth
    AU  - Nilantha Bandara Rathnayake
    AU  - Shanilka Aruni Welarahne
    Y1  - 2019/07/12
    PY  - 2019
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajmsp.20190401.14
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ajmsp.20190401.14
    T2  - American Journal of Materials Synthesis and Processing
    JF  - American Journal of Materials Synthesis and Processing
    JO  - American Journal of Materials Synthesis and Processing
    SP  - 32
    EP  - 36
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2575-1530
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajmsp.20190401.14
    AB  - Aim of this study was to introduce an eco-friendly, low cost and durable clay bricks with partial substitution of Cow Dung Ash (CDA). Five types of clay brick, consist CDA percentages 0, 5 10, 15 and 20% to the total weight of mixture, were manufactured by employing traditional method of dimension (18.5×8.5×6.5) cm3. The clay and CDA were well mixed with the addition of sufficient amount of water to form a good workability. Green molded bricks were allowed to dry under sunlight for two days and then fired in the traditional brick kiln. Physical properties of the burned red bricks were then tested and analyzed with Sri Lankan and British Standard Specifications. The average density, water absorption, compressive strength and flexural strength for 10% Cow Dung Ash (CDA) are 1447 kg.m-3, 17%, 150 kg.cm-2 and 0.82 kg.cm-2 respectively. These physical properties were compared with the standard brick purely manufactured from clay. From the results, clay-CDA bricks are obviously superior to the control brick; those are available in the Eastern region markets.
    VL  - 4
    IS  - 1
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Eastern University, Chenkalady, Vanthrumoolai, Sri Lanka

  • Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Eastern University, Chenkalady, Vanthrumoolai, Sri Lanka

  • Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Eastern University, Chenkalady, Vanthrumoolai, Sri Lanka

  • Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Eastern University, Chenkalady, Vanthrumoolai, Sri Lanka

  • Sections